Pages

Showing posts with label From the Media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label From the Media. Show all posts

Friday, June 7, 2013

Death sentence for 3 Tamil Tiger Terrorists over train bombing

A Sri Lankan High Court on Tuesday sentenced to jail three Tamil Tiger terrorists over a deadly train bombing 17 years ago.
Colombo High Court Judge Kumudini Wickramasinghe sentenced the three terrorists to jail over the 1996 bombing of a train in Dehiwala, in the outskirts of the capital Colombo in which 70 people were killed and nearly 400 others injured.
Two men charged with the crime were sentenced to 10 years rigorous imprisonment while a female rebel was given a 5 year jail term.
All three had pleaded guilty over their involvement in the bombing. The July 24, 1996 attack was carried out by Tamil Tiger operatives placing suitcase bombs in four carriages on a commuter train.
The simultaneous explosion of these bombs resulted in a large number of casualties.
The Tamil Tigers were responsible for several deadly attacks in and around the capital, including suicide attacks, killing thousands during the 30 year war with the government.
The Tamil Tigers were eventually defeated in a humanitarian operation in May 2009 with the military regaining control over all the areas held by the Tiger terrorists in the north and east of the country
Courtesy : Department Of Government Information 
Link:  http://www.defence.lk/new.asp?fname=Death_sentence_for_3_Tamil_Tiger_Terrorists_over_train_bombing_20130607_02

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

වඩේ සුදා පෝරකයට

මීරිගම විල්වත්තේ රූමතිය ඝාතනය කළ

වඩේ සුදා පෝරකයට

තවත් චෝදනා 2කට වසර 30ක සිර දඬුවම් හා රු. 15,000ක දඩ
නිශානි බුද්ධිකා
රටපුරා මහත් ආන්දෝලනයට තුඩු දුන් මීරිගම විල්වත්ත ප්‍රදේශයේදී මීට වසර හයකට පමණ පෙර තරුණියක දූෂණය කර ඝාතනය කිරීමේ සිද්ධියට සම්බන්ධ සැකකරුට ගම්පහ මහාධිකරණ විනිසුරු පියසීලි වික්‍රමසිංහ මතුරට මහත්මිය ඊයේ (21) මරණ දණ්ඩනය නියම කළා ය.
‘වඩේ සුදා’
ඊට අමතරව විත්තිකරුට චෝදනා දෙකකට වසර තිහක බරපතළ වැඩ සහිත සිර දඬුවම නියම කළ අතර එකී චෝදනා දෙකට රුපියල් පහළොස් දහසක දඩයක් ද මහේස්ත්‍රාත්වරිය විසින් නියම කෙරිණි.
දඩ මුදල නොගෙවන්නේ නම් වසරක සිර දඬුවමක් ද මහේස්ත්‍රාත්වරිය විසින් ්නියම කෙරිණි.
සිද්ධියට අදාළව මරණීය දණ්ඩනය නියම කෙරුණේ, වනසිංහ ආරච්චිගේ සමන්ත තිලකසිරි නොහොත් ‘වඩේ සුදා’ නමැත්තාටයි.
සිද්ධියෙන් ඝාතනයට ලක් වූයේ ස්ටීවන් කෝරළාගේ දොන් නිශානි බුද්ධිකා (26) නමැත්තියයි.
වසර 2006 - 11 -03 දින මීරිගම විල්වත්තේ දී මෙම තැනැත්තිය දූෂණය කිරීම, ඇය සතු රන් ආභරණ කොල්ල කෑම සහ ඇයව ඝාතනය කිරීම සිදු කර ඇති බවට අධිකරණයට අනාවරණය විය.
නීතිපති උපදෙස් අනුව මෙම නඩුව ගම්පහ මහාධිකරණයේ දී 2012 - 02 - 10 දින ආරම්භ විය.
පැමිණිල්ල වෙනුවෙන් රජයේ අධි නීතිඥ දම්තිනී ද සිල්වා මෙනෙවිය පෙනී සිටි අතර විත්තිය වෙනුවෙන් නීතිඥ ශ්‍රී කාන්ත මහතා පෙනී සිටියේ ය.
 දිනමිණ 22 මැයි 2012

.

Sunday, May 20, 2012

Condemned! – Rejected Human Beings

By Niranjala Ariyawansha

The female ward of the Welikada Prison Complex houses convicts local as well as foreign
Q: Who are condemned
prisoners?
A: Well, do you know what condemned vehicles are?
Q: They are vehicles unsuitable for use.
A: That’s right. Condemned prisoners are those unsuitable to enter civil society, expelled from society and simply totally rejected human beings.
These responses come from Asoka Hapuaarachchi, Deputy Commissioner of Prisons, sitting in his cozy office inside the Welikada Prison Complex.
However, on the outer side of the high walls, large bold letters declare: Prisoners are also Human Beings!
One wonders at the fate of these prison inmates who are condemned to live under officials who consider the prisoners as ‘rejected or unsuitable for civil society. Some may view the comparison as ‘absurd’. While I view the whole process as abhorrent, it is interesting to note the novel interpretation the Dy Prisons Commissioner comes up with regard to human life.
Readers may wonder what all this fuss about technical terms. The issue is not about terminology. It’s about the final analysis in the interpretation. How the subject of humanity has been assessed; and the interpretation they themselves provide for humanity, which they themselves had placed on a high pedestal.
There are 854 such ‘condemned’ men and women in Welikada, Mahara and Bogambara prisons as at April 30, 2012.  They have been convicted by court for murder and other such serious crimes.
For some time, they have been making one single demand. That is that they be executed, or convert their death sentence to life imprisonment. They have been making this demand since 2001as it is the year they had been condemned to this ‘No Man’s Land’.
Death by hanging has been suspended since June 5, 1976 and those sentenced to death that year had their sentences converted to life imprisonment. Life imprisonment lasts about 20 years, but according to the Prisons Ordinance, those who fall into the category of Good Conduct could be freed in 12 or 14 years enabling them to enter civil society. That was the procedure followed since the death sentence was converted to Life Imprisonment since 1976.
Life Imprisonment was terminated on May 26, 2002 and ever since, the condemned prisoners are in a serious dilemma resulting in severe mental stress. A. Dissanayake, Secretary to the Ministry of Prisons and Prison Reforms explains the reasons behind the decision to terminate the death sentence.
“There was a reason to stop life imprisonment for condemned prisoners in 2001. A judge sentenced an accused and his sentence was converted to life imprisonment. After being released from prison, he again committed a crime and was produced before the very same judge who sentenced him earlier. The judge made a statement declaring it a dangerous precedent. It was after that incident that the conversion of death sentence into life imprisonment was suspended effective May 26, 2001.
In Sri Lanka, after the death sentence is pronounced in courts, the sanction of the head of state is necessary to carry out the  sentence. Although the death sentence was suspended since 1976, it has so far not been abolished. The sanction of the Head of State comes in the form of declaring the date that the execution should be carried out. In such circumstances, what is the fate of the condemned prisoner? Before 1976, the condemned prisoners were aware that they would be executed. Later, when the death sentence was converted to life imprisonment, there was a definite change in that assumption realizing that some day they would go free. During those passing years, there was the possibility of them repenting for their past crimes and prepare themselves to come back into the civil society. Despite the fact that had committed serious crimes, the prisoners do have used the time spent in prison to come back to the right path.
However today, these prisoners are totally uncertain of their future. Uncertainty seems to extend to eternity and they vehemently demand that their sentences be converted to life imprisonment or they be executed.
Sri Lankas are quite used to long queues of various sorts, but this segment of Sri Lankans are languishing in a entirely different kind of queue… a queue that ends in certain death!
There are certainly criminals involved in most heinous crimes. They are those who wrested the right to life from fellow human beings. As such they should certainly be punished. But this writer is totally against killings and executions, both legal and illegal.
However, the cause for concern is in the uncertainty of their sentence. A jailor employed in the Welikada prisons, who wished to remain anonymous has this to say:
“They are all criminals. There’s no doubt about it. They should serve a long prison term for their crimes. But it is also a crime to keep them in suspense without carrying out the death sentence or turning their sentence into life imprisonment.  They always ask us what their fate is. We have no answers, for we ourselves are unaware of their fate.”
According to prison officials, of the 854 who had received death sentence, 498 have appealed against the conviction. They claim that the other issue is that it would take at least five years for those appeals to be reviewed.
Commenting on this issue, Ministry Secretary Dissanayake says that to date the number sentenced to death is very high. With the escalation of crime by the day, the situation would worsen, he added.
“The number in the Death Row has increased to 854. We are indeed sensitive to their plight and a committee headed by a judge has been appointed in 2011that includes officials of the Ministry of Justice and Prisons Department. The report of that committee has been handed over to the Presidential Secretariat. The committee has recommended that the sanction of the Attorney General and the Justice Minister is needed to carry out the death sentence. In addition, the sanction of the President is also necessary. Also there are recommendations that each and every conviction be reviewed on an individual basis. According to our information, there could be more chances to obtain a presidential pardon.”
According to the Ministry Secretary, as a May 2012, there were about 25,000 inmates in various prisons and detention centres in the island and Rs. 318 is spent on each prisoner per day including meals amounting to about Rs. 7,950,000 per day. The total annual expenditure of the Prisons Department amounts to Rs. 3.9 billion, said the Secretary Dissanayake.
Rs. 271,572 is spent daily on the 854 in the death row totaling Rs. 99,123,780 per year.
However, an official at the Welikada Prison, who did not wish to be named, said that some inmates who had been in the prison for between 10 to 30 years can contract various diseases.
The ‘Chapel’ building at the Welikada Prison has 352 cells. However, these 352 cells have only 17 toilets. As of May 15, 2012 there were 4,146 inmates at the Welikada Prison. The ‘Chapel’ building had 2,500 inmates as of that same date.
Around 585 inmates at the prison who are on death row do not have toilet facilities and have to make do with whatever is available in their cell. For this purpose they have been supplied with a plastic bucket, and that plastic bucket remains in the cell for a full 24 hours.
An inmate who is on death row can be kept in a single cell or three inmates on death row can be kept in the same cell. Under prison laws two people on death row cannot be kept in one cell. The reason for this is that if two people are in one cell and one person commits a crime against the other, there is no witness to provide evidence.
The prison official said that in a cell where only one prisoner or three prisoners can be kept, there are six prisoners. There is no room for them to even move about. There are also six buckets-one for each of the prisoners.to use as a toilet. This situation is not for a short period, but remains round the clock.
Over the past fifteen years the Minister in charge of prisons, the secretary to the Ministry, the commissioner general of prisons or any other prison official have not inspected the poor conditions in the cells, the official said. “Karalliyadda so far is the best commissioner general to have been appointed. After he left the current Minister, secretary or Kodippili have not set foot in the cell areas so far”, the official said.
This official also said that Asoka Happuarachchi and the prison commissioner instead of looking at the welfare of the prisoners are instead having various events in the prison premises thus hiding the true conditions of the prison.
In a country with a population of over 21 million by the year 2012 there are at least 854 people sentence to death for various crimes. As such, the society too has a responsibility to ask the question whether they are to be brought back to civil society or let them languish in the death row for eternity?
Sri Lanka, down the ages, have been nurtured by a number of religions and today they all have been placed in a high pedestal by society.  As a result, our mindset too is based on various religious leanings much more than scientific thinking. One begins to wonder whether our religions have failed? In such circumstances, it is to be assumed that solutions that could not be found in religions could be sought within the legal system.
According to the secretary to the Ministry a presidential pardon is likely for most of the people who are on death row. However, we should not assume that all 854 people on death row will be released. As President Mahinda Rajapaksa takes the Miracle of Asia concept forward there is nothing stopping him from pardoning those 854 people. If he does that then that concept will see light faster.
Prisons deputy commissioner Asoka Happuarachchi says that the 854 inmates on death row are at Welikada, Bogambara and Mahara. All those who are facing charges before the law are still citizens of this country. However, although they have been sentenced to death, one should not forget the fact that they too are citizens of this country. ‘According to law humanity is given preference over anything else.’ However, today we live in a society the Rajapaksa regime is providing hilarious interpretations to humanity, law and order and various other ideals.
Source: Sunday Leader online edition:  Last access 20 May 2012
link: //www.thesundayleader.lk/2012/05/20/condemned-rejected-human-beings/
Information for sale
Deputy commissioner Asoka Happuarachchi, when contacted regarding some of the issues in the prison, said that he will get back to us and took this reporters mobile number. He then called back from his office phone and provided some information regarding the conditions in the prison.  Excerpts of the conversation: Asoka Happuarachchi: The information I have given you now is worth between 200,000 and 300,000. How much will you get for this story? Reporter: What I get is only my monthly salary.






Thursday, April 26, 2012

ජීවිත සමාව-විසි අවුරුදු සිර දඬුවම යළි ක්‍රියාවට නැංවීම ගැන නිර්දේශ

මරණ දඬුවම සහ ජීවිතාන්තය දක්වා සිර දඬුවම් නියම වූ සිරකරුවන්ට ජීවිත සමාව සහ විසි අවුරුදු සිරදඬුවම යළිත් ක්‍රියාත්මක කිරීම සඳහා වන නිර්දේශ ඇතුළත් වාර්තාවක් පුනරුත්ථාපන හා බන්ධනාගාර ප්‍රතිසංස්කරණ අමාත්‍යංශය මගින් අධිකරණ අමාත්‍යංශයට ඉදිරිපත් කර ඇත.
මේ දඬුවම් යළි සංශෝධන තුළින් ක්‍රියාත්මක කිරීමට පුනරුත්ථාපන හා බන්ධනාගාර ප්‍රතිසංස්කරණ ඇමැති චන්ද්‍රසිරි ගජදීර මහතා කමිටුවක් පත් කළ අතර එම කමිටු වාර්තාව මෙසේ ඉදිරිපත් කර ඇත.
මේ යෝජනා ඇතුළත් කමිටු වාර්තාව අධිකරණ අමාත්‍යංශය මගින් ජනාධිපති මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ මහතා වෙත යොමු කෙරෙන අතර ජනාධිපතිවරයා මේ සම්බන්ධයෙන් ලබාදෙන තීන්දුව මත දඬුවම පෙර තිබූ පරිදි ක්‍රියාවට නැංවෙයි.
වර්ෂ 1976න් පසු මරණ දණ්ඩනය ක්‍රියාත්මක නොවූ අතර එයින් පසු මරණ දණ්ඩනයට නියම වූවන්ද ජීවිතාන්තය දක්වාම බන්ධනාගාරගත කර තැබිණි.
මරණ දණ්ඩනයට නියමවූවන් යහපත් කල්ක්‍රියාවෙන් බන්ධනාගාර තුළ කල් ගත කිරීමේදී ඔවුනට ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ අවසරය මත ජීවිත සමාව හිමිවිය.
ජීවිතාන්තය දක්වා සිර දඬුවම් නියම වූවන් යහපත් කල්ක්‍රියාවෙන් බන්ධනාගාරය තුළ කටයුතු කිරීම තුළ එම දඬුවම 20 අවුරුදු කාල සීමාවේ සිට 10 අවුරුදු කාල සීමාව දක්වා වන නීති ක්‍රමයක් එතැන් පටන් ක්‍රියාත්මක විණි.
එහෙත් වසර 2002 දී මේ ක්‍රමය අහෝසි කළ අතර එයින් පසු මේ වර්ගයේ රැඳවියන්ට ජීවිත සමාව හෝ දඬුවම් කාල සීමා ලිහිල් කිරීමක් සිදු නොකෙරිණි.
මේ වනවිට වැලිකඩ සහ බෝගම්බර බන්ධනාගාර තුළ මරණ දණ්ඩනයට නියමවූ රැඳවියෝ 355 ක් සිටින අතර ජීවිතාන්තය දක්වා සිරදඬුවම් නියම වූවන් 243 දෙනෙක් සිටියි.
 Dinamina 2012 April 26th

Monday, February 27, 2012

Sri Lanka: Monk hangs self in Kandy Prison

A Buddhist monk who was detained at the Kandy remand prison after being arrested for possessing marijuana has committed suicide by hanging himself.

Police spokesman SP Ajith Rohana says the 73-year-old monk, of a monastery in Wilgamuwa, was found dead in his prison cell on Friday (25) morning.

The monk was arrested by Wilgamuwa Police on February 19 for possessing 500g of ganja and remanded after being produced before Naula Magistrate’s Court the following day.

The body is currently placed at the Kandy Hospital mortuary while postmortem examinations have not been completed yet, the police media spokesman said in a release.
Source: Sri Lanka News -Adadeerana on line edition

Sri Lanka: Two Men Sentence to Death

The Kandy High Court sentenced to death two murder suspects who had been involved in a murder that took place in 2001 in Harasgama Road Matale.

Kandy High Court Judge Ms. M.C.Phuspamalee sentenced to death the two accused B.G. Karunaratne alias Raja and B. Ariyaratne over the murder of H.D.Wimalasena on or about September 7, 2001.

There were six witnesses called by the prosecution and the Judicial Medical Officer Dr. Sanjeewa Illanayake in evidence submitted to court that there had been eight injuries on the body and the skull was in pieces triggering brain damage.

At the conclusion of the trial, the High Court Judge sentenced both accused to be hung and ordered that they should be at the Bogambara Prison until the date for the hanging is announced by the President.
Source: Dali y Mirror on line edition (L.B.Senaratane)

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Sri Lanka: Another Six individuals received Death Penalty


The Provincial High Court of Kegalle today (Feb. 08) handed down death sentences to six individuals convicted in three murder cases. 

The suspects were found guilty of three separate murders which had taken place in Aranayake, Avissawella and Deraniyagala.

High Court Judge Menaka Wijesundara handed down the sentences as the charges against the suspects had been proven beyond reasonable doubt. 
Source: Ada Dearana. 

Friday, February 3, 2012

Sri Lanka: Puttalam District court issues death sentence

Sunday Leader on line edition
The Puttalam High Court issued the death sentence on a suspect arrested in 2007 for having heroin in his possession.
P. Mohomad Jauffer was found guilty today for having heroin in his possession when a vehicle was stopped at a police check point in Nagaviluwa, Puttalam in 2007.
Puttalam High Court judge S.B Arafat Kassim issued the death sentence when the case was taken up for hearing today.
The first accused in the case, K. Selvaratnam, was released by the court while another suspect, Salam Azwar, is believed to have fled to India.
High Court judge S.B Arafat Kassim issued an arrest warrant for Azwar and instructed the police to present the warrant to the police in India.
Heroin weighing some 899.5 grams was found in the vehicle at the time it was checked but the suspect had managed to flee.
Following investigations, the police identified the three suspects and arrested two of them as the other man had fled the country.
03 Feb 2012 

Friday, June 24, 2011

Sri Lanka: Death Row Prisoners Go On Hunger Strike


Hundreds of prisoners on death row or serving life in jail in Sri Lanka are staging a hunger strike.
They are trying to try to persuade the government to set them free or commute their sentences.
Around 600 prisoners at Columbo's Welikada jail refused food on Monday, and there are reports of similar protests in two other prisons.
Despite the large number of prisoners on death row, Sri Lanka has not carried out capital punishment since 1977.
However, in the late 1990s it suspended a process whereby sentences used to be regularly commuted, so many inmates have no idea what the future holds.
The head of the prisons service, Maj-Gen V.R. de Silva, told the BBC that more than 600 of the 4,000 prisoners at the high-security Welikada prison had refused food on Monday morning.
Twenty were demonstrating on the prison roof. There are reports of similar protests, also involving large numbers, in two jails outside Colombo.
The number involved has grown since last Thursday, when more than 100 prisoners started a demonstration demanding that the authorities rescind their death sentences.
Maj-Gen de Silva said the protesting prisoners are convicted of crimes including murder, rape and drug-trafficking.
They are said to be unhappy that they were not included in a general amnesty implemented for more than 800 more minor offenders a week ago.
The wheels of justice move notoriously slowly in Sri Lanka and the jails are said to be severely overcrowded, with poor conditions.
Source: bbc news 23 May 2011

Three Sri Lanka Army men sentence to death

By Farook Thajudeen
The Colombo High Court yesterday imposed the death sentence on three soldiers who were found guilty of the abduction, rape and murder of a 22-year-old woman in Jaffna in 1996. The three soldiers, Gamini Saman Uyanage, A. P. Sarathchandra and D. Gamage Kithsiri were indicted for the abduction and murder of Valaudan Pillai Rajini in Kondavil on or around October 30, 1996. Gamini Saman Uyanage and D. Gamage Kithsiri were also indicted for the rape of the 22-year-old woman.
High Court judge P. W. D. C. Jayatilake imposed the death sentence on the three accused when the seven-member jury found them guilty of the murder. 
State Counsel Lakmini Girihagama appeared for the prosecution. 
Source: Daily  Mirror 31 March  2011

Monday, January 31, 2011

Prisons To Revert To Defence Ministry

[Sunday Leader 31 Feb 2011] In the backdrop of lawlessness in prisons, the Prisons Department will once more revert to the Defence Ministry, it’s learnt.
Prisons which was formerly under the Defence Ministry, currently functions under the Prisons Reforms Ministry.
The present level of lawlessness in prisons is attributed to the fact that it comes under a separate ministry and not under defence, as was the case formerly, with coordination between the two ministries not being easy to combat crime in prisons at the present.
The most recent case being in Anuradhapura, and  previously at Welikada, when the police raided the Colombo prison, but were attacked by the prisoners with over 40 policemen suffering injuries.
Powerful underworld figures whilst in prison still give instructions to their minions via mobile phones to continue with their criminal acts, the most common being extortion, because prison authorities are allegedly not doing their job by confiscating such mobiles or SIMS or allowing the batteries of such mobiles to be re-charged, allegedly within the prison premises itself, nor jamming those particular wave lengths used by those prisoners from their mobiles to make calls outside to continue with their works of crime, thereby making the controlling of crime, emanating from the four walls within the prisons premises itself, difficult. It’s the prerogative of the prison authorities to search and confiscate such mobile phones, but those are not being done, a reason for the move to re-merge prisons with the Defence Ministry.

Monday, January 24, 2011

Prisoners shot dead

Written by Jamila Najmuddin 
At least three prisoners were killed and over 20 people were injured after a shooting incident was reported from inside the Anuradhapura prison this evening.
According to sources, the injured have been rushed to the Anuradhapura hospital for further treatment.
Sources said that two prisoners were found dead inside the prison while another died on admission to the Anuradhapura hospital.
The shooting took place when a security contingent was deployed to the prison to control a situation which had developed following a roof top protest by several prisoners.
Around 20 prisoners had staged the protest on top of Ward 'B' of the prison complex yesterday and by this morning the number of prisoners on protest had increased to 50. The prisoners were protesting against some prison officials and were also demanding better facilities.
Security has been tightened within the prison premises as a tense situation prevails in the area, sources told News Now.lk a short while ago.The STF has now been deployed to the prison and the situation is under control, sources at the prison said

Friday, December 31, 2010

Kyrgyzstan becomes 73rd country to pass irreversible abolition


Published by Emile Carreau on 2010/12/17 (290 reads)
Kyrgyzstan becomes 73rd country to pass irreversible abolition
Following one year of lobbying led by the World Coalition, the central Asian country has become a party to the UN protocol on the abolition of the death penalty.

On December 6 Kyrgyzstan acceded  to UN protocol on the abolition of the death penalty, becoming the 73rd state party to this treaty since its adoption in 1989.
Up until its accession, Kyrgyzstan was one of several World Coalition target countries in its campaign for the ratification of the text, officially known as the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Advocacy work started in October 2009 with the official launch of the campaign. Since then the World Coalition and its partners, the countries ‘friends of the Protocol’, convened meetings with the authorities, sent reports to the UN and official letters to the President and Parliament.
That was the case in November 2009, when the Parliament rejected the bill for the ratification of the Protocol. The bill was reintroduced and subsequently adopted in February 2010.

Accession despite political turmoil

The World Coalition sent a second letter shortly afterwards to congratulate the President and Parliament for passing the law for the ratification and urged them to deposit the instrument of ratification to the Secretary General of the UN for the ratification to be officially recognized under international law. Kyrgyzstan’s accession took nine more months because of political turmoil in the country.
Kyrgyzstan has been an abolitionist country since 1998 when the last execution took place and an unofficial moratorium on executions started. In December 2006 the Constitution was revised and in June 2007 the death penalty was abolished in law with its removal from the Penal Code. 
At an international level Kyrgyzstan voted in favour of the United National General Assembly resolutions on a moratorium on the use of the death penalty in 2007 and 2008. Kyrgyzstan has also committed itself to voting in favour of the upcoming moratorium resolution in December 2010 and, as in 2008, is co-sponsoring the resolution.
Kyrgyzstan has joined some of its closest neighbours, namely Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan as a state party to the Second Optional Protocol. It is hoped that other Central Asian nations, such as Kazakhstan and Tajikistan, will follow Kyrgyzstan’s lead and join the worldwide trend towards the abolition of the death penalty.

Friday, November 5, 2010

Sri Lanka Committee To Recommend Proposals On Death Row Convicts

The Rehabilitation and Prison Reforms Minister has appointed a three-member committee to recommend the commutation to life sentences of 400 convicts who are on death row.
The committee has also been asked to examine which of the 400 convicts on death row should be pardoned and released.
The Committee is headed by retired High Court Judge Hector Yapa and it has been asked to submit it report at the earliest, after examining the possibilities of granting a pardon to most of the convicts who have served many years in prison.
Rehabilitation and Prison Reforms Minister D.E.W. Gunasekera has said that once he receives the recommendations, and after consulting with the President, he would submit a Cabinet paper to implement the recommendations.

Monday, October 25, 2010

177 Year RI as Child


By Susitha R. Fernando [ Daliy Mirror 25th Oct 2010]
 
In a shocking revelation, a Fundamental Rights application revealed that a person is serving a 117-year of Rigorous Imprisonment for offences he was said to have committed as a child.
The petitioner, who has already served 24 years in jail since he was 16, said that many of the offences had not been committed by him. He claimed that he was forced to undergo the sorrowful plight due to the injustices caused by the officers of judicial and criminal justice system of the country.
R. A. Jayampathy Perera claimed that as an underage, the police forced him to plead guilty for some of the offences not committed by him, while Magistrates were confused as to whether to sentence him considering his age on the date of the offences alleged to have committed by him or the age on the date the sentences were imposed.
Finally at the Prison Department, the prison authorities had interpreted the sentences and imposed consecutive sentences whereas the orders against him were to be spent concurrently.
Filing on behalf of Jayampathy Perera Lawyers for Human Rights and Development (LHRD) complained that various Magistrates had sentenced him disregarding his age, below sixteen year. “One Magistrate had imposed five years rigorous imprisonment for an alleged theft he was said to have committed when just 12 years of age, petition stated. 
Jayampathy’s story
Jayampathy born on May 14, 1964 had been born to family victimized by a drunkard father and he and his mother had to suffer severally and had to undergo starvation as the father would quarrel at home and prevent them from taking their meals on time. Though good at studies, father had tried to burn his books and school bag  pouring kerosene oil. Later mother was compelled to work as a labourer and Jayampathy, returned from school had to wait hungry until she cooked whenever she come back from work.

Unable to bear this one day he had plucked vegetable from a plot of his relatives in the vicinity and had sold them to buy something to eat. He had continued to do this and whenever he was caught he was assaulted and tied to a tree until his mother came and rescue in the evening.
As he could not continue this he had taken up to begging and gradually forgotten the school. But later when his mother come to know he had
stopped and started to collect scrap iron with his mother and elder brothers.
However at the age of 14 there were 24 complaints made against Jayampathy and all minor thefts of which the culprits could be identified were put to his account by the police.
His first conviction had been on April 25, 1979 by Mount Lavinia Magistrate when he was convicted together with his mother for a theft of a pair of scissors and Rs. 500 and he had been warned and discharged. Again on October 4, 1979 he had pleaded guilty for a theft and was sent to Pannipitiya Detention Home and after spending some time he had run away from there. In February 1981 he had been arrested by Mirihana police and there a Sub Inspector had forced him to plead guilty as he would be treated as juvenile offender and impose a 3 year sentence even though he had committed one or hundred offences.
Subsequently he had pleaded for 14 cases at the Gangodawila Magistrate on February 16, 1981 without being represented by a lawyer.
In all the 14 cases the magistrate had imposed various imprisonment which were to be spent concurrently only within a period of 4 years and eight months. But the prison authorities had calculated it to be 64 years.
However according to the Code of Criminal Procedure Act a Magistrate could impose only a sentence of imprisonment not exceeding two years, legal sources said.
Subsequently he had been convicted by various magistrate courts including Moratuwa, Mount Lavinia, Ratnapura , Avissawella, Homagama  and Pelmadulla for offences of burglary and theft and they were alleged to have committed when he was below the age of 16 years, the age limit which he was entitled to be tried and sentence under the provisions of the Children and Young Persons Ordinance or Youthful Offenders Training Schools Ordinance as most of the offences had been committed when he was a child of 12 and 15 years of age. However Jayampathy instead had been treated as a hardcore adult criminal, attorney Kanchana Priyadarshani who filed the for LHRD stated.
However, having spent eight years in prison, on February 1989, Jayampathy had been released by the License Board on condition. Thereafter he had got married in 1991 and had three children. But however much he had tried to live a decent life it had not been easy as the police had several time arrested him on false allegations and later released claiming that they had made a mistake and the real culprits had been arrested.
In 1994 Jayampthay had been arrested again and four cases filed in Bandaragma Magistrates court who imposed five years simple imprisonment on each case together with five more years for escaping from the prison and all the sentences to be spent concurrently.
But the prison authorities who interpreted it as jail terms to be spent consecutively made Jayampathy to languish for 25 years.
Further in violation of the Licence Board conditions Jayampathy was made to spend total of 142 years together with the earlier 117 years.
In his Fundamental Rights application, he complained that grave injustices had been caused due to various authorities of the criminal justice system. Jayampathy claimed he was mislead by the police to plead guilty to a large number of cases he had not committed promising him that he would be imposed short term imprisonment to be spent concurrently. The Magistrates had imposed sentences disregarding his age and finally the prison authorities had miscalculated his jail terms imposed on him on the basis that they were to be spent consecutively.
The cited Minster of Justice Athaude Seneviratne, Minster of Rehabilitation and Prisons Reforms, D. E. W. Gunsekera, Minster of Child Development, Tissa Karaliyadda, The Commissioner of Prison, the Secretary Judicial Service Commission and the Attorney General.
He asked the Supreme Court to order on the relevant authorities to release him and lay down suitable guidelines to be followed by all judicial authorities in sentencing underage offenders.
http://www.dailymirror.lk/print/