Pages

Friday, July 8, 2011

Demonstration for Rizana Nafeek


 Muslim Guardian:  29th June 

A demonstration was held outside the Saudi embassy in Colombo, urging that a Sri Lankan maid in Saudi Arabia be released from prison where a death sentence is hanging over her.
She was convicted of murdering a baby in her care but insists she is innocent and her parents say she was in any case legally a child when the alleged killing took place.
Charles Havilland reporting from Colombo said that about 100 Sri Lankans – including Action For Peace and Human Rights [APHR]  women’s’ rights and Muslim campaigners and politicians – staged a protest at the embassy, urging that the young maid, Rizana Nafeek, be released from her Saudi jail and spared the executioner’s sword.
They stressed that Sri Lankan women should be stopped from migrating to the Kingdom for domestic work.
There is increased anxiety in Sri Lanka about Rizana Nafeek’s case because an Indonesian maid, also convicted of a killing in Saudi Arabia, was recently executed.
But Sri Lanka’s minister of foreign employment, Dilan Perera, says Nafeek’s death sentence is in fact currently suspended and that Colombo is still trying to save her life through a pardon.
“This incident needs to be handled with caution and should not be exploited for political gain, “Minister Perera said.
The minister said that opposition parliamentarians are trying to exploit this issue while the government is continuing its efforts to obtain pardon for Rizana.

Rizana’s Case: The Power of Mercy An over view

Rossana Favero-Karunaratna July 5th 2011

The recent news about Rizana Nafeek have been disseminated by all sectors of our media. It is also necessary to mention the role of Saudi Arabian papers in English in the electronic media highlighting this case. The Saudi Arabian papers have also exposed details about Rizana and her arrival to that country, how her passport referred to a false date of birth, turning her into a minor seeking employment as a housemaid. The Dawadmi High Court sentenced Rizana Nafeek to death for killing the baby she was entrusted to look after. President Mahinda Rajapaksa intervened seeking pardon from the King of Saudi Arabia and Minister Rauf Hakeem is planning to send a delegation to ask for clemency for her.

There are many interesting and relevant points in this case to reflect and understand the present situation of Rizana. She was a minor when the sad event took place and a life of a child was lost.

Article 7 of the Arab Charter of Human rights entered into force in 2008 stipulates that:

(a) Sentence of death shall not be imposed on persons under 18 years of age, unless otherwise stipulated in the laws in force at the time of the commission of the crime.

"According to this international instrument, it is prohibited to render a sentence using the death penalty on a person under eighteen at the time of the crime, suspend execution and enforce it once the person reaches majority. The Committee on the rights of the child (there after the Committee) has always recommended that a person should not be executed for a crime committed when she was under eighteen years old , for example in one of its concluding observations it observed that : ""The Committee remains concerned that national legislation appears to allow children between the age of 16 and 18 to be sentenced to death with a two years suspension of execution .It is the opinion of the Committee that the imposition of suspended death on children constitute cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment…" .

(Children’s rights and the death penalty in the Arab States, by Professor Kamel FI L AL I, Vice Chairman of the United Nations CRC)

Comments of readers in Saudi Arabia refer to several of these details , raising questions about the age of this girl, the absence of Mahrams- how women can travel so far without someone to look after them and the application of Shariah Law and the absence of a post mortem report of the infant.However they also refer to the application of the Shariah Law. Everybody who travels to a Muslim country should have at least basic information about its importance and relevance in daily life.

All aspects of a Muslim’s life are governed by Shariah and therefore that law is also applicable to Rizana. Shariah Law comes from a combination of important sources including the Qur’an (the Muslim Holy Book), the Hadith (sayings of the Holy Prophet Muhammad) and Fatwas (rulings of Islamic scholars).

Normally us, the non-Muslim sectors, associate Shariah Law with physical punishment and death. For Muslims, it is an important source of justice and it must be imposed. However we should all make an effort to understand the essence of Shariah.

"Today I have perfected your way of life (din) for you, and completed My favour upon you, and have chosen Islam as your way of life." (Qur’an, 5:3) The Holy Prophet Muhammad himself was told that, "We have only sent you as a mercy for all creation." (Qur’an, 21:179)

Shariah regulates life in order to attain perfection as it is seen as divine. Judges have a very deep knowledge on these matters and when there are different issues involved it is a common feature that Judges will refer to Shariah. If a sinful act has been committed therefore there must be a punishment that can act as deterrent for others. However, Shariah Law has, at the same time, the aspects of compassion, kindness, generosity, justice and tolerance. Shariah is in essence therefore opposed to cruelty and injustice. Rizana, was a minor when this incident happened and this fact puts her in a different situation as she was underage when she was performing her activities. This situation also raises the question if the event that took place could be defined as a sinful act or an accidental death caused when the infant choked with the milk he was drinking.

Shariah Law in relation to murder allows capital punishment, death penalty but after judicial judgement has been pronounced, appeals are allowed to the family of the victims, and they are begged to be merciful. It has been said that in Islam, it is always regarded as the height of mercy to forgive a murderer. Rizana has been convicted for murder.

Many comments in the Saudi papers give evidence of readers praying for the parents of the infant and fervently supporting the requests to pardon Rizana who they consider an innocent girl, wishing and praying Almighty Allah also to bless this affected parents with more wonderful and beautiful kids. The treatment of the Saudi papers in relation to Rizana herself has also been fair and with a compassionate approach.

Having said this, it is the power of mercy which will play a role in this case. It can be the prayers of all of us not only for Rizana but for the parents of the infant who died, to be able to be blessed and given peace at the end of the day. I believe the Muslim community has a big role to play in this case. While reading various sources of information for this article I came across these lines which really inspired me and which must guide us , having in mind Rizana and the grieving parents of both sides:

May Allah inspire you, to live your life under the shade of the mercy of Allah, Praised and Exalted be He. And may Allah, make you instruments of His mercy, not of His punishment.

http://www.island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=article-details&code_title=29438
 

Saving Rizana: ACJU Appeal seeks clemency

By Rifthi Ali 5th July 2011 The All Ceylon Jammiyyathul Ulema (ACJU), the Supreme Council of Muslim Theologians of Sri Lanka had sent a letter to King Abdullah bin Abdul-Aziz of Saudi Arabia requesting the release of the Sri Lankan maid Rizana Nafeek, who was sentenced to death by a High Court in Saudi Arabia for allegedly causing the death of a four-month-old infant in her care. 
This letter was sent to the Saudi King Abdullah bin Abdul-Aziz through the External Affairs Ministry.
According to the letter, the ACJU had pleaded with the Saudi Arabian King to request the infant’s mother to  pardon Rizana Nafeek since the infant’s father was willing to pardon her but the mother has still not given her pardon.  The Sri Lankan government has expressed its willingness to pay  blood money for the pardon.
ACJU President Ash-Sheikh M.I.M. Rizvi Mufthi and General Secretary Ash-Sheikh M.N.A. Mubark had signed this letter. A discussion to seek the release of the Sri Lankan maid Rizana Nafeek was held at the External Affairs Ministry under the External Affairs Ministry monitoring parliamentarian Sajin Vas Gunawardena last week.
Meanwhile, Sri Lanka Muslim Congress (SLMC) Leader and Justice Minister Rauff Hakeem has requested a meeting with the victim’s family and the respective tribal leaders to seek reconciliation.
Source: Dali y Mirror 

Saturday, July 2, 2011

Jayalath Bandara: The Story of Disable Death Row Inmate

    

මම ජයලත් බණ්ඩාර. ඉපදුණේ 1977 නොවැම්බර් 11. අපේ ගෙවල් තිබුණේ වැල්ලවායේ ඇතිලිවැව. දැන් පදිංචිය මිහිපිට තියෙන නරකම තැනට මීටර කිහිපයක් දුරින්. මම දැන් මෙතනට ඇවිත් අවුරුදු ගණනාවක් ගත වෙලා ගිහිං.
ඒත් මම මෙහාට ආවේ ඇයි? ඒ කොහොමද? මේ ගැන තියෙන්නේ වාව ගන්න බැරි විමතියක් විතරයි.
එදා 1994 ජනවාරි 02 ඉරිදා. නිවාඩුව අදින් ඉවරයි. හෙට ඉස්කෝලේ පටන් ගන්නවා. ඇතිලිවැව කනිෂ්ඨ විද්‍යාලයේ 10 වසරේ මුල් ම පංතියට යන්නයි ලැහැස්ති වෙලා හිටියේ’ උදේ තාත්තයි අයියලා දෙන්නයි කුඹුරට ගියා. පොඩි උදැල්ලක් කරේ තියා ගෙන මාත් ඒ පස්සෙන් ගියා. මේක අපි අවුරුදු ගණනාවක් අඳේට වැඩ කරපු කුඹුර. එදි යත්දි උස මහත මිනිහෙක් අපේ කුඹුරේ වැඩ කරමින් හිටියා. ඒ මනුස්සයගේ නම නන්දසිරි. ගමේ චණ්ඩියෙක්.
”අදින් පස්සේ උඹලට මේ කුඹුර කරන්න දෙන්නේ නෑ” – කියලා නන්දසිරි කිව්වා.
ඒ කතාවට තාත්තයි අයියලා දෙන්නයි පැටළුණා. දරුණුවට බැණ අඬ ගහ ගත්තා. අපේ ලොකු අයියා (චන්දරත්න බණ්ඩාර) කැත්තකින් නන්දසිරිට කෙටුවා. ඒ මනුස්සය ලේ පෙරාගෙන කුඹුරට වැටුණා. ලොකු අයියා ආපහු පාරවල් කිහිපයක් ගහනවා මම දැක්කා. ඒ සිද්ධියෙන් පස්සේ මම ගෙදරටම දුව ගෙන ආවා. තාත්තයි අයියලා දෙන්නයි කොහේ ගියාද දන්නේ නෑ. පැය දෙක තුනකින් දැන ගන්න ලැබුණා නන්දසිරි මැරිලා කියලා. ඒ ගමන ලොකු අයියා කැත්තත් අරගෙන ගිහිං පොලීසියට බාර වුණා.
ඒ වුණාට පොලීසියෙන් ඇවිත් තාත්තවයි - පොඩි අයියයි දෙන්නත් අරගෙන ගියා. තුන් දෙනාම රිමාන්ඩ් කළා. ඔය අතරේ අම්මා මාව ගෙදරින් පිටමං කළා. මම මහියංගණේ අක්කලාගේ ගෙදර ගියා. සති දෙකකට විතර පස්සේ ගෙදර ඇවිත් ආපහු ඉස්කෝලේ යන්න පටන් ගත්තා. ඒ වෙත්දී මට වයස අවුරුදු 14 යි. මාස දෙකක් විතර ගතවෙලා ගියා. එක දවසක් පොලීසියෙන් ඉස්කෝලෙට ඇවිත් මාව අරගෙන යන්න හැදුවා. ඒ වෙලාවේ ගුරුවරු ඒකට විරුද්ධ වෙලා මාව දෙන්න බැහැ කියලා තදින් කිව්වා. පොලීසිය හැරිලා ගියා.
ඒත් 1994 මාර්තු මාසේ පොලීසිය ගෙදරට ඇවිත් මාව අත්අඩංගුවට ගත්තා. උසාවියේදී විනිශ්චයකාරතුමා පුදුම වුණා. අවුරුදු 14 ක බාල වයස්කාරයෙක් නිසා මාව රිමාන්ඩ් කරන්න බැහැ කියලා එතුමා කිව්වා. නමුත් පොලීසිය තදින් ම කිව්වා මං මේ මිනීමැරුමට සම්බන්ධයි කියලා. ඒ සැරේ එක දවසකට රැඳවුම්බාරයට පත් කරලා රුපියල් 2000 ක ඇපයක් මත මාව මුදා හරින්න නියෝග කළා. පොලීසියට ගිහිං කට උත්තරයක් දෙන්න කියලත් නියම කෙරුණා.
අපේ අම්මා පොලීසිය දැක්කගමන් වෙවුලනවා. මාත් ඊට ඉස්සර පොලීසියකට ගිහිං නෑ. පොලීසියට ගිය වෙලාවේ මගෙන් ප්‍රශ්න කිහිපයක් අහලා සැර දැම්මා. පොලීසියේ මහත්තයෙක් පොතක දිග සටහනක් ලිව්වා. ඒක කියවන්න වත් බලන්න වත් දුන්නේ නෑ. අස්සන් කරපං කියලා බල කළා. මම අම්ම ගේ මුහුණ දිහා බැලුවා. ඒ සැරේ පොලීසියේ මහත්තයා අම්මටත් බැන්නා. මම ඒකට අස්සන් කරලා ගෙදර ආවා. ආපහු ඉස්කෝලේ යන්න පටන් ගත්තා. ඒත් වෙනදා වගේ නෙවෙයි. ගුරුවරු ළමයි එහෙම මගේ දිහා බැලුවේ කැලෑ සතෙක් දිහා බලනවා වගේ. හිතේ එකලාසයක් නෑ. හරියට කෑමක් බීමක් ගෙදර තිබුණෙත් නෑ. අපේ ගෙදරට මහා ශාපයක් පල දුන්නා වගේ.
ජයලත් තරුණ වියේ
තවත් මාස ගණනාවකට පස්සේ තාත්තයි අයියලා දෙන්නයි ඇප පිට ගෙදර ආවා. තාත්තා හැමදාම බොන්න පටන් ගත්තා. ගෙදර ප්‍රශ්න එන්න එන්න කඳු ගැහෙන්න ගත්තා.
ඔය අතරේ ලොකු අයියා කොළඹ කොම්පැණියක රස්සාවකට ගියා. ගෙදරට තිබුණ එකම ආදායම් මාර්ගය ඒක විතරයි. මම ඉස්කෝලේ ගමන නතර කරලා වඩු වැඩ ඉගෙන ගන්න පටන් ගත්තා. ඔය අතරේ වඩු පංතියේ හිටිය යාළුවෙක් එක්ක දවසක් එයාල ගේ ගෙදර ගියා.
”කුරුම්බා කඩාගෙන බොමුද?” කියලා යාළුවා ඇහුවා. මම ගහට නැග්ගා. ගහ මුදුනේදී පොල්පිතිවල එල්ලිලා කුරුම්බා ගෙඩියක් කඩන්න ගෙඩිය කැරකුවා. පොල්පිති එක්කම මාව ගහ මුදුනේ ඉඳන් බිම වැටුණා. මට සිහිය ආවට පස්සෙයි දැන ගත්තේ මගේ තුනටියෙන් පහළ කොටස පණ නෑ කියලා. මේ සිද්ධිය වුණේ 1996 දී. එදා ඉඳන් කවදාවත් මං ඇවිද්දේ නෑ. මාව නඩු දිනයට උසාවියට අරගෙන ගියේ දෙන්නෙක් දෙපැත්තකින් උස්සාගෙන ඒ නිසා මට උසාවියට යන්න ඉඩක් ලැබුණෙ ම නෑ. ඇඳක වැතිරිලා මුළු කාලෙම බෙහෙත් බැඳගෙනයි හිටියේ...”
මේ කතාව අපට කියන ජයලත් බණ්ඩාර තවදුරටත් පවසන පරිදි; නිසි ප්‍රතිකාර ලබා ගත්තේ නම් ඔහුට සුවය ලැබීමට ඉඩ කඩ තිබුණේලු. එහෙත් අනපේක්ෂිත ලෙස තෙවරක්ම ඒ අවස්ථා අහිමි වී යන්නේ ආර්ථික දුෂ්කරතා නිසා වරින් වර ප්‍රතිකාර නතර කරන්නට සිදු වීමෙනි.
”හොරිවිල වෙද මහත්තයා තමයි අන්තිමට මාව බාර ගත්තේ. අමාරුව හොඳ කරන්න පුළුවන් කියලා වෙද මහත්තයා කිව්වා. කාලයක් නතර වෙලා ප්‍රතිකාර ගත්තා. ඒ අතර තමයි නඩු තීන්දුව ලැබුණේ. අන්තිමට මට නතර වෙන්න සිද්ධ වුණේ හිර ගෙදර.”
2002 ජූලි 27 ජයලත් ගේ පවුලේ සියලු දෙනාට ම අමතක නොවන දවසකි. ගම්පහ ප්‍රදේශයේ ඇළ මාර්ගයක නාඳුනන පුද්ගලයකු ගේ මළ සිරුරක් පාවෙමින් තිබියදී සොයා ගැනිණ. මරණය සිදු වී තිබුණේ අමානුෂික ලෙස පහර දීමෙන් සහ ගෙල සිර කිරීමෙනි. ඒ පුවත්පත් වාර්තාව ජයලත්ට කියවීමට ලැබී තිබිණ. එහෙත් ඒ ප්‍රවෘත්තිය තම පවුලට අදාළ වේයැයි ඔහු කිසිවිටෙක සිතුවේ නැත.
ජයලත් පාසල් සමයේ
”මාසේ පඩිය අරගෙන අයියයි තව යාළුවෝ දෙන්නෙකුයි ගම්පහ පැත්තේ ගමනක් ගිහිං තියෙනවා. අයිය ගේ පඩි සල්ලි මංකොල්ල කෑව යාළුවෝ දෙන්නා එයාව මරලා ඇළට දාලා කියලා දැන ගන්න ලැබුණා. ඒ මැරුණේ ලොකු අයියා (චන්ද්‍රරත්න බණ්ඩාර) මේ සිද්ධියෙන් පස්සේ අපිට කරකියා ගන්න කිසිම දෙයක් නැතිව ගියා. ඒත් අයියා රස්සාව කරපු කොම්පැණියේ මහත්වරු අපිට උදවු කළා. මට රෝද පුටුවක් අරගෙන දීලා බෙහෙත් කරන්නත් ඒ අය ඉදිරිපත් වුණා. ඒත් අසනීපේ හොඳ කරන්න කලින් නඩුවේ තීන්දුව ලැබුණා. මීට කලින් අවස්ථා තුනකදීත් ප්‍රතිකා නතර කරන්න සිද්ධ වුණා. එක දිගට ඒ බෙහෙත් හේත් කළා නම් මාව සනීප කරන්න පුළුවන් කියලා වෙද මහත්වරු කිව්වා...”
නියමිත පරිදි නඩු දිනවලදී අධිකරණය හමුවේ පෙනී සිටීමට නොහැකි වීම නිසා ඔහුට තවත් අවාසියක් සිදු විය. එනම් ජයලත් බණ්ඩාර නැතිව නඩු විභාගය පවත්වා ගෙන යෑමට තීරණය වීමය.
”... ඒ සිද්ධිය වුණේ 1998 පෙබරවාරි මාසෙදී. මේ නඩුවේදී වැරදිකාරයද? නිවැරදිකාරයද? කියන ප්‍රශ්නයටවත් පිළිතුරක් දෙන්න මට ඉඩක් ලැබුණේ නෑ. මොකද නඩුව විභාග කෙරුණේ මම උසාවිය ඉදිරියේ පෙනී නොසිටින විත්තිකාරයෙක් හැටියට සලකලයි. හැබැයි ඉතිං ඒක මගේත් කැමැත්තෙන් වුණ තීරණයක්.
අපේ නඩුව විභාග කෙරුණේ බදුල්ල මහාධිකරණයේ. තීන්දුව දෙන්න සති දෙක තුනකට කලින් හිතා ගන්න බැරි දෙයක් වුණා. අපි වෙනුවෙන් පෙනී හිටිය නීතිඥයා නඩුවෙන් ඉවත් වුණා. 2003.10.14 දා තීන්දුව දුන්නා. අපි හතර දෙනාම වැරදිකාරයෝ හැටියට එල්ලා මරන්න තීන්දු කෙරුණා. මේ තීන්දුවත් එක්කම මම, පොඩි අයියා (ධර්ම කීර්ති බණ්ඩාර) තාත්තා, අංක 35 කියන ෂෙල් එකට දැම්මා. අපි ඇපෑලක් ඉදිරිපත් කළා. නමුත් 2007 මාර්තු 16 දා අභියාචනාධිකරණයෙනුත් ඒ තීන්දුවම අනුමත කෙරුණා.
මේ සිද්ධියත් එක්කම අම්ම ගේ ඔළුවේ නහරයක් පිපිරිලා සති ගණනක් සිහි නැතුව ඉඳලා අන්තිමට අම්මා මැරුණා. ගත වුණේ මාස දෙකයි හිර ගෙදරදී තාත්තා ඇදගෙන වැටුණා. ආපහු නැගිට්ටේ නෑ. තාත්තත් නැති වුණා. අන්තිමට ඉතුරු වුණේ මමයි පොඩි අයියයි විතරයි.
අද පොඩි අයියා වැලිකඩ මරණ දඬුවම නියම වුණ ෂෙල් එකක ඉන්නවා. මම බෝගම්බර හිර ගෙදර මරණ දඬුවම නියම වුණ ෂෙල් එකක ඉන්නවා.”
ජයලත් බණ්ඩාර ගේ කතාව තවමත් අවසාන නැත.
මව සහ ඥාති සොහොයුරියෝ
අපේ ලොකු අයිය ගේ අතින් අපරාධයක් වුණා. වරදට දඬුවමක් තියෙන්න ඕනේ. එයාගෙත් ජීවිතේ නැති වුණා. නමුත් මේ සිද්ධිය වෙත්දී මට අවුරුදු 14 යි. මම නිර්දෝෂයි කියලා ලෝකෙට ඇහෙන්න කෑගහලා කිව්වත් වැඩක් නැති බව මම දන්නවා. නමුත් මට පොලීසියේදී වගේම උසාවියේදීත් නීතිඥ සහාය හරියට ලැබුණේ නෑ. අනිත් පැත්තෙන් මම සදාකාලික අබ්බගාතයෙක්. ජීවිතයේ කවදාවත් තනියම හිට ගන්න, අඩියක් වත් ඇවිදින්න මට වාසනාවක් නෑ. දැන් අවුරුදු නවයක් මම මරණ දණ්ඩනය නියම වුණු හිරකාරයෙක් හැටියට මේ ෂෙල් එකට කොටු වෙලා ජීවත් වෙනවා. හැබැයි මෙහෙම ඉන්නවට වඩා එල්ලලා මරණවා නං ඒක සැපයි...”
”මාව මේ නඩුවට පැටලෙව්වේ වැල්ලවායේ පොලීසිය. ඒක වෙනම කතාවක්. එදා පොලීසිය සාධාරණව ක්‍රියා කළා නං මට මෙහෙම විඳවන්න වෙන්නේ නෑ. අනිත් පැත්තෙන් මට නඩුවට පෙනී ඉන්න හැටියක් තිබුණෙත් නෑ. මේ අපේ මුළු පවුලෙන්ම පළිගන්න අටවපු කෝන්තරයක් බව අපි පසුව දැන ගත්තා..”
ජයලත් බණ්ඩාරට තවක් කීමට බොහෝ දේ ඇති බැව් පෙනිණ. එහෙත් කතාව අවසන් කළ යුතුය.
”දැන් මගේ වයස අවුරුදු 33 යි. ඒත් මේ මරණ දණ්ඩනය නියම වුණු අනිත් අයට වඩා මම වෙනස්. මාත් එක්කම මරණ දණ්ඩනයට නියම වෙලා මේ ෂෙල් එකේ ඉන්න යාළුවෝ නැතුව මට බොන්න වතුර ටිකක් වත් ගන්න විදිහක් නෑ. කෑම ටික ගෙනත් දෙන්නේ – ඉඳුල් පිඟාන හෝදලා තියන්නේ - වෙන එකක් තියා මම වැසිකිළියට පවා යන්නේ ඒ අය ගේ අත් උදව්වෙන්. සමහර වෙලාවට මළ මුත්‍ර ඒ අයගේ ඇඟ පතෙත් ගෑවෙනවා. නමුත් මේ මිනිස්සු මට මනුස්සයෙක් වගේ ජීවත් වෙන්න උදවු කරනවා. කොටින්ම කිව්වොත් නිදා ගන්න බිමට වැටෙන්නත් – බිමට වැටිලා නිදිය ගෙන පහු වෙනිදාට නැඟිට ගන්නත් මට කාගේ හරි අත් වාරුවක් ඕනේමයි. එල්ලලා මරණවනං මීට වඩා හොඳයි කිව්වේ ඒ නිසයි... (ඔහු කතාව නතර කොට විනාඩියක් පමණ නිහඬව සිටියේය.)
”... මැරෙන එකත් ප්‍රශ්නයක්... එල්ලලා මරණවා නං එල්ලුම්ගහට යන්න වෙන්නෙත් තව දෙන්නෙක් ගේ කරේ එල්ලිලා... ඒකත් මදි නේ... බෙල්ලට තොණ්ඩුව දාලා එල්ලුම් ගහ ක්‍රියාත්මක වෙනකං ඒ අයට මාව උත්සගෙන ඉන්නත් වෙනවා. මොකද මට තනියම කෙළින් හිටගෙන ඉන්න බැරි නිසා... කොටින්ම මට තව කාගේ හරි උදව්වක් නැතිව එල්ලුම්ගහටවත් යන්න බෑ...”
එසේ කී ජයලත් බණ්ඩාර සිනාසුණේය. ඒ සිනහව අමුතුය. මම තිගැස්සී ගියෙමි. ගතේ හිරිගඩු පිපෙන තරමට මා තිගැස්සුණේ ඇයි? ඊටත් ජයලත් සිනාසුණේ කාටද?
ජයලත් ගේ සහෝදරියක් වැල්ලවාය ප්‍රදේශයේ ජීවත් වෙන බව අසන්නට ලැබිණ. මම ඇයට කතා කළෙමි.
”ජයලත් ගේ පිංතූරයක් හොයා ගන්න පුළුවන්ද?”
”පුංචිම කාලේ ගත්ත පිංතූරයක් විතරයි තියෙන්නේ. මල්ලී කවදා හරි දවසක ගෙදර එනතුරු මතක් වෙන්න තියෙන්නේ එච්චරයි...”


 

Rizana Nafeek,:Sri Lankan government plans to send a special delegation to seek clemency

 

 By MD RASOOLDEEN | ARAB NEWS
COLOMBO: On an initiative made by Sri Lanka’s Justice Minister Rauf Hakeem, the Sri Lankan government plans to send a special delegation to seek clemency for Rizana Nafeek, the housemaid who was sentenced to death by a high court in Saudi Arabia for the murder of a four-month-old infant in her care.
A three-member bench at the Dawadmi High Court, some 380 km from the capital, sentenced Nafeek for killing the baby she was entrusted to look after in the absence of her Saudi employers at home. She maintains that the newborn choked during bottle feeding and that she tried to seek help.
Nafeek entered the Kingdom as a minor (aged 17) to work as a maid on documents forged by her recruiter to work as a maid. She was then assigned nanny duties by the family.
Hakeem said he discussed Nafeek’s issue with the Saudi delegation, which attended  the Asian-African Legal Consultative Organization (AALCO) that concluded in Colombo on Friday.
The Sri Lankan minister sought the release of Nafeek on humanitarian grounds considering thepoor circumstances of her family. However, Mansoor Al-Ghaffari, leader of the Saudi delegation at the AALCO meeting and adviser to the minister of justice, and Farook Wazir Ali, charge d’affaires of the Saudi Embassy in Colombo, said the Shariah is supreme. In cases deemed to be homicide, the state cannot intervene on the private rights of the next of kin. To spare the condemned the death penalty, the family must either forgive her or come to a blood-money settlement, which often involves a reconciliation committee and financial help from charitable individuals or institutions.
Hakeem has requested a meeting with the victim’s  family and the respective tribal leaders to seek reconciliation. The minister said that he could also arrange for the blood money in the event financial compensation is requested in return for private clemency from the family.
Basil Fernando, director of the Asian Human Rights Commission, which has been active in this case, had also sent an appeal to all foreign missions based in the Kingdom to exercise their influence to negotiate a pardon from the parents.
It is illegal for a foreign resident under the age of 18 to work in the Kingdom. And anyone who criminally facilitates such an act — such as forging identity papers to acquire a visa — is a human trafficker. As of yet there have been no charges filed in Sri Lanka pertaining to this crime.
It is believed that a facilitator in Sri Lanka forged Nafeek's age in order to send her to the Kingdom as a housemaid.
Saudi Arabia is a signatory to an international agreement not to put to death people who have committed capital crimes as minors. However, when the pledge was signed the Saudi government underscored at the time that it could not and would not contradict Shariah rules on private rights and administering capital punishment under Islamic law.
This leaves minors at the mercy of the next of kin in cases that are ruled homicide. The defense has argued that the crime was accidental death, but the court struck down that argument and sided with the family in its claim Rizana maliciously murdered their infant.

Mothers and Daughters of Lanka asked the Sri Lanka government to intervene

By Nabeela Hussain
The Mothers and Daughters of Lanka (MDL) Organisation yesterday asked the government to intervene in order to save the life of imprisoned Sri Lankan maid Rizana Nafeek in Saudi Arabia.
The Organization also asked the government to put in place laws that will ensure the safety of the women who leave the country for work as it is they who bring in most of the foreign currency.
“It is the women who suffer and work hard to bring in so much of foreign currency not only from abroad but also in the free trade zones and the hill country,” said Convenor of MDL Padmini Weerasooriya. She pointed out that it was the responsibility of the government to ensure the safety of the women who go abroad  as they are the main foreign currency earners.
Ms. Weerasooriya also asked that those responsible for her plight be brought forward and be punished before the law.
“We believe that the agency that sent her needs to be prosecuted for what they have done,” she said.
“We also ask the King of Saudi Arabia and the family that she worked for to forgive her and not to execute,” Ms. Weerasooriya said.
The Organisation implored that the sentence for Rizana Nafeek be lessened.
Source: Daily  Mirror On line edition 
http://print.dailymirror.lk/news/front-page-news/48868.html

Demonstration for Rizana

 
Sri Lanka [28th June 2011] A demonstrations was held outside the Saudi embassy in Colombo, urging that a Sri Lankan maid in Saudi Arabia be released from prison where a death sentence is hanging over her.
She was convicted of murdering a baby in her care but insists she is innocent and her parents say she was in any case legally a child when the alleged killing took place.
Charles Haviland reporting from Colombo said that about 100 Sri Lankans – including women’s’ rights and Muslim campaigners and politicians – staged a protest at the embassy, urging that the young maid, Rizana Nafeek, be released from her Saudi jail and spared the executioner’s sword.
They stressed that Sri Lankan women should be stopped from migrating to the Kingdom for domestic work.
There is increased anxiety in Sri Lanka about Rizana Nafeek’s case because an Indonesian maid, also convicted of a killing in Saudi Arabia, was recently executed.
But Sri Lanka’s minister of foreign employment, Dilan Perera, says Nafeek’s death sentence is in fact currently suspended and that Colombo is still trying to save her life through a pardon.
“This incident needs to be handled with caution and should not be exploited for political gain, “Minister Perera said.
The minister said that opposition parliamentarians are trying to exploit this issue while the government is continuing its efforts to obtain pardon for Rizana
Source: 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sinhala/news/story/2011/06/110628_colomborizana.shtml

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Rizana Nafeek: Medieval Murder in Modern Times

By Daily Mail Reporter
26 June 2011 
A young maid is facing death by beheading in Saudi Arabia for a crime she claims she did not commit.
Rizana Nafeek, who alleges she was a teenager at the time of the incident, was arrested in May 2005 on charges of murdering a four-month-old baby who was in her care.
The Sri-Lankan born maid denies murder and claims she desperately tried to save the child, who choked while she was looking after it.
The news comes just days after Indonesia announced it would ban women from travelling to the kingdom for domestic work after another maid was beheaded there

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2008273/Medieval-murder-modern-times-Sri-Lankan-born-Rizana-Nafeek-faces-death-beheading-Saudi-Arabia.html#ixzz1Qa4tXjgk

 

Friday, June 24, 2011

Over 250 detainees escaped from Sri Lanka prisons in 2010

June 23, Colombo:
The Prisons Department of Sri Lanka says that last year over 250 detainees had escaped from the country's prisons.
The Prisons Department's Performance Report for 2010 that has been presented to Parliament states that 251 detainees had escaped from prisons around the country with the highest escapes of 43 being recorded from the Welikada Prison in Colombo.
The other inmates who have escaped are 14 inmates from Bogambara, 21 from Mahara, 13 from Watarekka and 26 from Pallekele.
The report has also stated that persons in remand prison have also escaped.
Meanwhile, 15,839 prisoners had been granted amnesties in 2010 and 12,861 prisoners have been released under the prisons' general amnesty.
Sri Lanka's Prison Reforms and Rehabilitation Ministry has meanwhile, initiated prison reforms aimed at easing the congestion in prisons island wide.
Source: Colombo Page 

Sri Lanka: Death Row Prisoners Go On Hunger Strike


Hundreds of prisoners on death row or serving life in jail in Sri Lanka are staging a hunger strike.
They are trying to try to persuade the government to set them free or commute their sentences.
Around 600 prisoners at Columbo's Welikada jail refused food on Monday, and there are reports of similar protests in two other prisons.
Despite the large number of prisoners on death row, Sri Lanka has not carried out capital punishment since 1977.
However, in the late 1990s it suspended a process whereby sentences used to be regularly commuted, so many inmates have no idea what the future holds.
The head of the prisons service, Maj-Gen V.R. de Silva, told the BBC that more than 600 of the 4,000 prisoners at the high-security Welikada prison had refused food on Monday morning.
Twenty were demonstrating on the prison roof. There are reports of similar protests, also involving large numbers, in two jails outside Colombo.
The number involved has grown since last Thursday, when more than 100 prisoners started a demonstration demanding that the authorities rescind their death sentences.
Maj-Gen de Silva said the protesting prisoners are convicted of crimes including murder, rape and drug-trafficking.
They are said to be unhappy that they were not included in a general amnesty implemented for more than 800 more minor offenders a week ago.
The wheels of justice move notoriously slowly in Sri Lanka and the jails are said to be severely overcrowded, with poor conditions.
Source: bbc news 23 May 2011

Three Sri Lanka Army men sentence to death

By Farook Thajudeen
The Colombo High Court yesterday imposed the death sentence on three soldiers who were found guilty of the abduction, rape and murder of a 22-year-old woman in Jaffna in 1996. The three soldiers, Gamini Saman Uyanage, A. P. Sarathchandra and D. Gamage Kithsiri were indicted for the abduction and murder of Valaudan Pillai Rajini in Kondavil on or around October 30, 1996. Gamini Saman Uyanage and D. Gamage Kithsiri were also indicted for the rape of the 22-year-old woman.
High Court judge P. W. D. C. Jayatilake imposed the death sentence on the three accused when the seven-member jury found them guilty of the murder. 
State Counsel Lakmini Girihagama appeared for the prosecution. 
Source: Daily  Mirror 31 March  2011

Monday, January 31, 2011

Prisons To Revert To Defence Ministry

[Sunday Leader 31 Feb 2011] In the backdrop of lawlessness in prisons, the Prisons Department will once more revert to the Defence Ministry, it’s learnt.
Prisons which was formerly under the Defence Ministry, currently functions under the Prisons Reforms Ministry.
The present level of lawlessness in prisons is attributed to the fact that it comes under a separate ministry and not under defence, as was the case formerly, with coordination between the two ministries not being easy to combat crime in prisons at the present.
The most recent case being in Anuradhapura, and  previously at Welikada, when the police raided the Colombo prison, but were attacked by the prisoners with over 40 policemen suffering injuries.
Powerful underworld figures whilst in prison still give instructions to their minions via mobile phones to continue with their criminal acts, the most common being extortion, because prison authorities are allegedly not doing their job by confiscating such mobiles or SIMS or allowing the batteries of such mobiles to be re-charged, allegedly within the prison premises itself, nor jamming those particular wave lengths used by those prisoners from their mobiles to make calls outside to continue with their works of crime, thereby making the controlling of crime, emanating from the four walls within the prisons premises itself, difficult. It’s the prerogative of the prison authorities to search and confiscate such mobile phones, but those are not being done, a reason for the move to re-merge prisons with the Defence Ministry.

Monday, January 24, 2011

Prisoners shot dead

Written by Jamila Najmuddin 
At least three prisoners were killed and over 20 people were injured after a shooting incident was reported from inside the Anuradhapura prison this evening.
According to sources, the injured have been rushed to the Anuradhapura hospital for further treatment.
Sources said that two prisoners were found dead inside the prison while another died on admission to the Anuradhapura hospital.
The shooting took place when a security contingent was deployed to the prison to control a situation which had developed following a roof top protest by several prisoners.
Around 20 prisoners had staged the protest on top of Ward 'B' of the prison complex yesterday and by this morning the number of prisoners on protest had increased to 50. The prisoners were protesting against some prison officials and were also demanding better facilities.
Security has been tightened within the prison premises as a tense situation prevails in the area, sources told News Now.lk a short while ago.The STF has now been deployed to the prison and the situation is under control, sources at the prison said

Friday, December 31, 2010

Kyrgyzstan becomes 73rd country to pass irreversible abolition


Published by Emile Carreau on 2010/12/17 (290 reads)
Kyrgyzstan becomes 73rd country to pass irreversible abolition
Following one year of lobbying led by the World Coalition, the central Asian country has become a party to the UN protocol on the abolition of the death penalty.

On December 6 Kyrgyzstan acceded  to UN protocol on the abolition of the death penalty, becoming the 73rd state party to this treaty since its adoption in 1989.
Up until its accession, Kyrgyzstan was one of several World Coalition target countries in its campaign for the ratification of the text, officially known as the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Advocacy work started in October 2009 with the official launch of the campaign. Since then the World Coalition and its partners, the countries ‘friends of the Protocol’, convened meetings with the authorities, sent reports to the UN and official letters to the President and Parliament.
That was the case in November 2009, when the Parliament rejected the bill for the ratification of the Protocol. The bill was reintroduced and subsequently adopted in February 2010.

Accession despite political turmoil

The World Coalition sent a second letter shortly afterwards to congratulate the President and Parliament for passing the law for the ratification and urged them to deposit the instrument of ratification to the Secretary General of the UN for the ratification to be officially recognized under international law. Kyrgyzstan’s accession took nine more months because of political turmoil in the country.
Kyrgyzstan has been an abolitionist country since 1998 when the last execution took place and an unofficial moratorium on executions started. In December 2006 the Constitution was revised and in June 2007 the death penalty was abolished in law with its removal from the Penal Code. 
At an international level Kyrgyzstan voted in favour of the United National General Assembly resolutions on a moratorium on the use of the death penalty in 2007 and 2008. Kyrgyzstan has also committed itself to voting in favour of the upcoming moratorium resolution in December 2010 and, as in 2008, is co-sponsoring the resolution.
Kyrgyzstan has joined some of its closest neighbours, namely Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan as a state party to the Second Optional Protocol. It is hoped that other Central Asian nations, such as Kazakhstan and Tajikistan, will follow Kyrgyzstan’s lead and join the worldwide trend towards the abolition of the death penalty.

Friday, November 12, 2010

Prayers For Rizana

<>
BBC Sinhala.Com 01 Nov 2010
 
 


Thousands of Muslims in Trincomalee gathered for a
 special payer service for the Sri Lankan maid
sentenced to death in Saudi Arabia.
 
Rizana Nafeek, a Sri Lankan housemaid, was arrested in May 2005
on charges of killing an infant in her care.
Last week her death sentence was upheld by Riyadh's
Supreme Court and awaits ratification from
King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia.
“We are asking the god to fill the hearts and minds of the infant’s
 parents with compassion and sympathy,” a social worker who
participated in the prayer service in Muttur, Kabir Mohamed Taafic
 told Sandeshaya.
Parents pardon
 
“Nothing could be done unless the child’s parents pardon Rizana,
if they do that Rizana can be freed from the death sentence” he said.
Rizana had originally confessed to the killing the four-month-old
Saudi boy in 2005
but later retracted her statement saying it had been made
under duress. She was a minor-
17 years old- at the time this happened and been in custody since 2005.
President Mahinda Rajapaksa has already appealed to the
King asking him to exercise clemency
 towards Rizana and many international human rights
organisation, including
Amnesty International are also campaigning on behalf of her.

Friday, November 5, 2010

Sri Lanka Committee To Recommend Proposals On Death Row Convicts

The Rehabilitation and Prison Reforms Minister has appointed a three-member committee to recommend the commutation to life sentences of 400 convicts who are on death row.
The committee has also been asked to examine which of the 400 convicts on death row should be pardoned and released.
The Committee is headed by retired High Court Judge Hector Yapa and it has been asked to submit it report at the earliest, after examining the possibilities of granting a pardon to most of the convicts who have served many years in prison.
Rehabilitation and Prison Reforms Minister D.E.W. Gunasekera has said that once he receives the recommendations, and after consulting with the President, he would submit a Cabinet paper to implement the recommendations.

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Save Rezana Nafeek from Death Penalty

It’s  a constitutional responsibility of the both heads of states to prevent the life of Rezana Nafeek from Death Penalty-APHR 

  
“The Sri Lanka President must fully make use of its diplomatic relationships, to save the innocent child victim Rizana Nafeek from the death penalty” said Action for Peace and Human Rights [APHR] in a media release today. While appreciating Sri Lankan Presidents immediate response to the Saudi Appeal Court judgment, the statement empathize the fact that the ineffective and corrupted laws in Sri Lanka had been able to discriminate the Rizana Nafeek at the age seventeen and sending her as a trained domestic servant to Saudi Arabia on a fraudulent passport passing immigrations offices of both countries”.
“Sri Lanka as well as Saudi Arabia are parties to the Convention of the Rights of the Child [CRC] which expressly prohibits execution of offenders committed when they were under 18 years old”.  “There fore it is a constitutional responsibility of the both Heads of States to prevent the execution of Rezana Nafeek from Death Penalty.
Rezana Nafeek migrated to Saudi Arabia at the age of 17 in 2005 to work as a domestic helper. The available facts clearly confirmed that the death of the naive baby who died in the hands of Rezana was an accident, rather than a grave criminal act. At the time of the incident, Rezana had been at the age of 17 and she was not trained as a qualified professional baby sitter. Amnesty International, ADPAN, Asian Human Rights Commission, Human Rights Watch and others have raised concerns about Nafeek's access to lawyers and competent translators during her interrogation and trial. Though she was arrested in 2005, she did not have access to legal counsel until after a court in Dawadmi sentenced her to death in 2007. Nafeek has also retracted a confession that she said to have made under duress, and says that the baby died in a choking accident while drinking from a bottle. She apparently told the authorities that she was born in February 1988, but they seem to have ignored this on the basis that her passport indicated that she was born in February 1982. According to information available to the public, no medical examination is believed to have been carried out to ascertain her age, nor was she given the opportunity to present her birth certificate, which reportedly shows that she was born in 1988.
APHR is opposed the Death Penalty in all circumstances, because of its violating the fundamental right of persons to be free from subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.  

Monday, October 25, 2010

177 Year RI as Child


By Susitha R. Fernando [ Daliy Mirror 25th Oct 2010]
 
In a shocking revelation, a Fundamental Rights application revealed that a person is serving a 117-year of Rigorous Imprisonment for offences he was said to have committed as a child.
The petitioner, who has already served 24 years in jail since he was 16, said that many of the offences had not been committed by him. He claimed that he was forced to undergo the sorrowful plight due to the injustices caused by the officers of judicial and criminal justice system of the country.
R. A. Jayampathy Perera claimed that as an underage, the police forced him to plead guilty for some of the offences not committed by him, while Magistrates were confused as to whether to sentence him considering his age on the date of the offences alleged to have committed by him or the age on the date the sentences were imposed.
Finally at the Prison Department, the prison authorities had interpreted the sentences and imposed consecutive sentences whereas the orders against him were to be spent concurrently.
Filing on behalf of Jayampathy Perera Lawyers for Human Rights and Development (LHRD) complained that various Magistrates had sentenced him disregarding his age, below sixteen year. “One Magistrate had imposed five years rigorous imprisonment for an alleged theft he was said to have committed when just 12 years of age, petition stated. 
Jayampathy’s story
Jayampathy born on May 14, 1964 had been born to family victimized by a drunkard father and he and his mother had to suffer severally and had to undergo starvation as the father would quarrel at home and prevent them from taking their meals on time. Though good at studies, father had tried to burn his books and school bag  pouring kerosene oil. Later mother was compelled to work as a labourer and Jayampathy, returned from school had to wait hungry until she cooked whenever she come back from work.

Unable to bear this one day he had plucked vegetable from a plot of his relatives in the vicinity and had sold them to buy something to eat. He had continued to do this and whenever he was caught he was assaulted and tied to a tree until his mother came and rescue in the evening.
As he could not continue this he had taken up to begging and gradually forgotten the school. But later when his mother come to know he had
stopped and started to collect scrap iron with his mother and elder brothers.
However at the age of 14 there were 24 complaints made against Jayampathy and all minor thefts of which the culprits could be identified were put to his account by the police.
His first conviction had been on April 25, 1979 by Mount Lavinia Magistrate when he was convicted together with his mother for a theft of a pair of scissors and Rs. 500 and he had been warned and discharged. Again on October 4, 1979 he had pleaded guilty for a theft and was sent to Pannipitiya Detention Home and after spending some time he had run away from there. In February 1981 he had been arrested by Mirihana police and there a Sub Inspector had forced him to plead guilty as he would be treated as juvenile offender and impose a 3 year sentence even though he had committed one or hundred offences.
Subsequently he had pleaded for 14 cases at the Gangodawila Magistrate on February 16, 1981 without being represented by a lawyer.
In all the 14 cases the magistrate had imposed various imprisonment which were to be spent concurrently only within a period of 4 years and eight months. But the prison authorities had calculated it to be 64 years.
However according to the Code of Criminal Procedure Act a Magistrate could impose only a sentence of imprisonment not exceeding two years, legal sources said.
Subsequently he had been convicted by various magistrate courts including Moratuwa, Mount Lavinia, Ratnapura , Avissawella, Homagama  and Pelmadulla for offences of burglary and theft and they were alleged to have committed when he was below the age of 16 years, the age limit which he was entitled to be tried and sentence under the provisions of the Children and Young Persons Ordinance or Youthful Offenders Training Schools Ordinance as most of the offences had been committed when he was a child of 12 and 15 years of age. However Jayampathy instead had been treated as a hardcore adult criminal, attorney Kanchana Priyadarshani who filed the for LHRD stated.
However, having spent eight years in prison, on February 1989, Jayampathy had been released by the License Board on condition. Thereafter he had got married in 1991 and had three children. But however much he had tried to live a decent life it had not been easy as the police had several time arrested him on false allegations and later released claiming that they had made a mistake and the real culprits had been arrested.
In 1994 Jayampthay had been arrested again and four cases filed in Bandaragma Magistrates court who imposed five years simple imprisonment on each case together with five more years for escaping from the prison and all the sentences to be spent concurrently.
But the prison authorities who interpreted it as jail terms to be spent consecutively made Jayampathy to languish for 25 years.
Further in violation of the Licence Board conditions Jayampathy was made to spend total of 142 years together with the earlier 117 years.
In his Fundamental Rights application, he complained that grave injustices had been caused due to various authorities of the criminal justice system. Jayampathy claimed he was mislead by the police to plead guilty to a large number of cases he had not committed promising him that he would be imposed short term imprisonment to be spent concurrently. The Magistrates had imposed sentences disregarding his age and finally the prison authorities had miscalculated his jail terms imposed on him on the basis that they were to be spent consecutively.
The cited Minster of Justice Athaude Seneviratne, Minster of Rehabilitation and Prisons Reforms, D. E. W. Gunsekera, Minster of Child Development, Tissa Karaliyadda, The Commissioner of Prison, the Secretary Judicial Service Commission and the Attorney General.
He asked the Supreme Court to order on the relevant authorities to release him and lay down suitable guidelines to be followed by all judicial authorities in sentencing underage offenders.
http://www.dailymirror.lk/print/

Saturday, October 23, 2010

Cites for Life-30th November 2010

More than 1,000 cities around the world light up symbolic buildings to commemorate the first time the death penalty was abolished – in 1786 in Tuscany. This event, Cities for Life, is organized by ADPAN partners, the Rome-based organization “Community of Sant’Egidio” on 30 November.

What you can do

    v Participate in Cities for Life on 30 November 2010. Over 80 countries in the world now participate in this event with over 1,000 cities in the world lighting up a monument as a symbol against the death penalty.
Reference materials on the “Cities for Life”:
-The event:
http://nodeathpenalty.santegidio.org/pag.aspx?ln=en&id=4
-List of cities participating in this initiative:
http://nodeathpenalty.santegidio.org/pag.aspx?ln=en&id=11
-How to join (on-line form):
http://www.santegidio.org/pdm/cities_for_life/ades_on_line.htm

Uganda: New law has saved 167 death row inmates

The Daily Monitor

167 Ugandan death row inmates saved from gallows
Recent figures show that a January ruling by the Ugandan supreme court making it illegal to keep people on death row for more than three years has saved 167 lives.
According to the Ugandan newspaper The Daily Monitor, 167 death row inmates have seen their sentence commuted to life in prison this year.
Their reprieve is the consequence of a January Supreme Court decision according to which it is unconstitutional to keep a person on death row for more than three years. The court argued that any longer term would represent an additional, illegal punishment.
“One hundred and fifty inmates qualified by the time the court order was made but as time goes by, over 10 more have qualified. The number is now 167,” Ugandan prisons spokesman Frank Baine told the Monitor on September 13.
The Supreme Court ruling resulted from legal action taken by hundreds of death row inmates over more than five years with support from local human rights lawyers, the British-based NGO Death Penalty Project and World Coalition member organization FHRI.
While activists had succeeded in having long periods on death row recognized as unconstitutional, the court had dismissed their argument that the death penalty itself was a violation of constitutional rights.
Other countries in the region, most recently Kenya, have been accepting the fact that spending more than three years on death row is an inhuman punishment and should be outlawed.http://nodeathpenalty.santegidio.org/news.aspx?ln=en&id=14&n=14203